New on slot demo for
編輯歷史
| 時間 | 作者 | 版本 |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 07:26 – 07:26 | r1 – r4 | |
顯示 diff- Untitled
-
- This pad text is synchronized as you type, so that everyone viewing this page sees the same text. This allows you to collaborate seamlessly on documents!
+ New on slot demo for
+ Two new bits on PTP this week.
+ First, if you’re looking for a site to help you kill time online, you could do worse than All In Magazine Online. Get the details on this handy addition to your time-killing tool box with Kef’s review of All In Online.
+ Second, Vin’s back after a week off with a new installment in his regular column. This week, he closes out the Remedial slot demo series with a column focused on the fiscal side of poker entitled ‘Ya Might as Well Spend it, Ya Can’t Take it With Ya.’ Excerpt!
+ It is a general rule of thumb to always buy in to a hold ‘em game with 20 times the “big” blind. In a three-six game that would be $60, in four-eight, it would be $80. My personal preference is to just buy in with a $100 rack. Heck, I’ve seen players buy in with the minimum, (which in most places is $20-$30) and (metaphorically) manhandle the other players, parlaying that buy in into six or seven hundred dollars or more. Rarely, mind you. Very rarely. But it does happen. Just don’t count on it. Try to stick with the traditional buy ins.
+ The reason for this is fairly simple. Twenty times the big blind, lets you take a look at a minimum of 150 hands (considering a full 10-seat table) and usually somewhere within that 150 you will more than likely see a “solidly playable” premium hand. Of course, I’ve had weeks where I haven’t seen a “premium” hand. And everyone I did see, whether I flopped the nuts or not, the Raising Maniacs beat me at the river. Just a few nights ago, at a brick and mortar casino, I had one of those nights. They even had a “special” where after midnight, the special was “Red or Black, Aces Cracked gives you Fifty Dollars Back,” and because of one of those aforementioned highly irritating lunatics, it cost me $72 to get my wired Red Aces beat, for a net loss of $22! That was the hand that sent me home. The rest of the night was even worse.
+ Well, enough of the woeful “Tales-of-Wells-Fargo.” The concept here is controlling your poker finances. One of the first things to do is to set up a separate, “special” account at your local bank that is specifically for card playing. It can be a checking or savings account or both, preferably an interest-bearing account, with debit card.
+ UIGEA tidbits
+ Russ Fox has an excellent blog post that sets the record straight about a few myths and popular inaccuracies regarding online gaming law - especially good points include clarification about the WTO case against the US and the likelihood of Democrats ‘reversing’ the UIGEA.
+ Wondering how the new Senate Majority Leader feels about online gaming? Poker News has a painfully short profile of Reid that provides just enough info to confuse you. My .02 - anyone who thinks that having a Senator from Nevada heading up the Senate is somehow bad for online gaming isn’t thinking the matter through. The MGMs and the Harrahs are quickly waking up to the possibilities of legalized, regulated online gaming in America, and Reid is arguably the best person to make the case for online gaming to fellow lawmakers.
|
||
| 2022-07-28 07:26 | r0 | |
顯示 diff+ Untitled
+ This pad text is synchronized as you type, so that everyone viewing this page sees the same text. This allows you to collaborate seamlessly on documents!
|
||